| LEARNING:
behaviour modification resulting from the correction of non-fatal errors |
 |
Learning is the process of networking operational
memories from the experiences of errors
which were small enough to recover from.
The terminal characteristic of catastrophic errors brings all learning to an
abrupt end and yet errors cannot
be avoided if learning is to proceed.
Most learning is involved in the development and acquisition of a sufficient
number of skills,
be it vision, hearing, language, walking,
driving, sexual performance or whatever,
to enable the individual to construct a conceptual
existence model
that is adequate for it's circumstances.
The cycloid strategy is one of the most effective.
Earlier learned skills are cyclically revisited and reinforced as new
learning processes are attempted.
Whether it is learning a language, training
to fly an aeroplane or trying to write a novel, the systematic and periodic
recycling of all material produces the most stable platform.
The helix or spiral continues to diverge into new territory, whether it be
in two or three dimensions, whilst returning in some
aspects to where it has been before.
The cycloid continually revisits familiar regions
and then diverges out and explores the new.
Specifically focussed learning environments are needed to
extend the individuals capacity to modify its operational world model to cope
with situations for which it has not been conditioned.
Most individuals need controlled training
environments to enable learning about the blood and guts of surgery
or war or accident carnage.
Unfamiliarity with hosts of insects, snakes, sharks and the like
make interacting with them difficult for many without a carefully
gauged program of approximated learning.
Being deposited unceremoniously from the culture
of one's nurture into another of impenetrable motivations and behaviours is usually
nothing less than traumatic.
Learning has to take place, of course, for the individual
to be able to construct a world model for itself.
What is absurdly prevalent in the ethnic and cultural arena however,
is that the individual that has acquired the learning is then likely to
imbue its blatant subjectivity with a cosmic
objectivity and aura of absolute certainty.
In this manner most, if not all, of its ideosyncratic nature
is entirely lost sight of and the acquired reality model becomes the only one
which the individual then considers that the rest of the world should
understand and be required to adhere to.
A member of one cultural group may be raised in a nurturing environment
which justifies and exploits the use of slaves as an operational world model
and unquestioningly supports its continuation, totally oblivious to the
alternative reality of the slaves.
Other individuals may be indoctrinated from birth by the adult members of
their group about the transgressions and atrocities committed upon them and
their ancestors by the hated other side.
They are mystified and confused when travelling far
afield and living with different peoples, that these others do not share
or agree with their publicly expressed hate of their home-state adversaries.
The education industries of state
and religion are the learning environments
which custom design their populace to believe in the
justification of local attitudes.
Death or exile very frequently remain as the only courses
available to individual
dissidents daring to deny the propaganda machinery of the establishment.